Only Celebrity News

The problem with Taylor Swift’s political activism


Taylor Swift’s place in the political sphere is complicated, to say the least. Early in her career, she stayed silent about politics. Swift has said that she acted this way for two main reasons: she believed that country music was hostile towards artists who spoke out politically, as was the case with the Dixie Chicks, and she did not feel educated enough to make political statements with the ability to influence millions of people. 

Although she began to dabble politics in 2018, she stayed silent about politics. inadvertently or intentionally, her role as not just a pop star also but an activist was cemented by her Lover album, which used political activism as part of its aesthetic. While I sympathize with Swift’s fears of political engagement derailing her career, I believe that she owes it to her fans to use her platform to speak on current issues, all the more because of her having curated an aesthetic surrounding activism previously. 

Lover was characterized by a pastel color palette and portrayed love in a wide array of forms with tracks discussing anxiety in romantic partnerships, self-love and acceptance, familial love and, most notably, LGBTQ+ pride. While Swift had supported the LGBTQ+ community in the past, the single “You Need To Calm Down” was a much more conspicuous showing of support. 

At the time “You Need To Calm Down” was well-received, winning awards such as “Video of the Year” at the 2019 VMAs, but it was not without controversy. While Swift was applauded for taking clear, deliberate action in support of the LGBTQ+ community, others feared that “You Need To Calm Down” and her other activism — such as writing letters to her senator and petitioning on change.org — were just part of a temporary marketing ploy that would be phased out before the release of Swift’s next album.

Regardless of the criticism she faced, it seemed clear to all that Swift was no longer afraid to contribute to political discourse and that her contributions could be a strong form of allyship. 

Her activism did largely fade out after the end of the Lover era, at least in regard to combating issues that do not directly affect her. She still speaks out when she, herself, feels targeted, such as when the Netflix show Ginny & Georgia slut-shamed her, as well as, more broadly, when women’s rights are challenged — she (belatedly) responded on Twitter to the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade. This is an example of her using politics at her convenience, rather than to do good in the world in a way that aids people other than herself.

This isn’t to say she never responds to issues that do not affect her — she does do so, such as when she spoke on the school shooting in Uvalde, Texas — but not at the volume that one would expect from a celebrity-turned-activist. Moreover no matter what…



Read More: The problem with Taylor Swift’s political activism

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments